Interesting discoveries

I do notice something like that. There's a spot where the head of the Helix sits, which seems like a good place, but sometimes the Progasm pivots inwards and hits something else entirely. I really don't understand why that is. I wish the Aneros company would do more to illustrate where the various models sit internally.

The deeper spot as I touch that seems to shoot sensations through the penis to the head and I get a rigid erection. Seems to hold more promise in this spot. Even had involuntary shaking of pelvic mucked and in the thighs. Not flailing about but is that more consistent withe other people's experience to the path of th e super o?

I just switched from peridise which was giving me a superficial orgasm. Definitely felt good and left my cock jumping up and down for the past hour. Now I have the helix classic in tail less as I write this. Able to lay here in bed with my legs flat and body relaxes and I can already feel it hitting a deeper spot leaving a shot of pleasure riding up to the head of my cock. A feeling of falling pleasure in my belly and wanting to shoot cum. Laying here and relaxing into it. Such different sensations and all enjoyable. It's stronger than ejaculate orgas and it just keeps going.

It's stronger than ejaculate orgas and it just keeps going.

This part is what... i don't know, annoyed me?, i wish i could feel that, I've never had something more powerful than an ejaculatory orgasm... then again i do have explosive emac orgasms that i believe are both super o and normal ejac combined into one. So comparisons are hard to do once you have had that happen a few times.

I wish the Aneros company would do more to illustrate where the various models sit internally.

In theory all of the devices (with the exception of the Peridise) are designed to sit in the rectum in a similar fashion. That said there are some small differences with respect to how each of the models engage the prostate and the surrounding tissue. These differences may have large implications in terms of how you experience these devices. A larger head produces more surface area contact, an angled head yields more focus (intensity). A wider midsection produces more anal engagement and a fuller sensation in the rectum. Thinner more tapered models are more agile with a more responsive action. While a cross-section illustration for all of the Aneros models would be very interesting from an academic perspective, I doubt that it would have a great deal of value to most users for selecting an appropriate model. After all, everyone's prostate is slightly different making it impossible to pinpoint the precise area of engagement of any device. And even if we had this, would it enable us to make a meaningful interpretation of what a particular model felt like without experiencing it ourselves?

When it comes to penile masturbation most men have a precise understanding of how they want to be stimulated and what works best for them. Experience has taught them what area is most responsive, what pressure is the most satisfying and how fast the stroke should be. And since a man can see his penis, he's able to pinpoint areas of greater sensitivity quite precisely. With the exception of expert users there are very few others who have that level of awareness about their prostates. My sense is that the experiential documentation of users in this forum will ultimately be more helpful than anything that can be gleaned from a diagram. This is particularly the case for those who are new to anal/prostate play and the Aneros.

Still and all, might be a fun thing to look at, I'll pass your suggestion up the line!

BF Mayfield