AI Assistant
MGX or SGX ?
 
Notifications
Clear all

MGX or SGX ?


(@trinity_x2)
Active Member Customer
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 6
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Hi Everyone ! O.K. so I've decided to buy the Aneros but I cant make up my mind which one I should get. I would like to hear from you guys about how each one feels. Help me decide.

Thanks to all who make this forum so cool !



   
Quote
B Mayfield
(@b-mayfield)
Member Adventurer Registered
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 2118
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I would have to say that unless you are totally new to anal play and have concerns about accomodating any object anally, that the MGX is the way to go. The SGX is smaller and less aggressive than the MGX owing to it's smaller size and lack of knobs on the end of the massager body. I started with the MGX about 15 months ago, and 6 months ago began my experimentation with the SGX. Although my early impressions with the SGX were more positive, I've come to realize that MGX is able to afford me with much more intense prostate stimulation. All in all, I would have to say that I would recommend the SGX only to those who have experienced consistent discomfort with the MGX, (which judging from the comments in this forum, haven't been that many, given the appropriate amount of time and proper techniques).

Hope this helps,

B Mayfield



   
ReplyQuote
(@guest)
Famed Member Customer
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 3728
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thanks B !



   
ReplyQuote
(@guest)
Famed Member Customer
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 3728
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Originally Posted By: b mayfield
I would have to say that unless you are totally new to anal play and have concerns about accomodating any object anally, that the MGX is the way to go. The SGX is smaller and less aggressive than the MGX owing to it's smaller size and lack of knobs on the end of the massager body. I started with the MGX about 15 months ago, and 6 months ago began my experimentation with the SGX. Although my early impressions with the SGX were more positive, I've come to realize that MGX is able to afford me with much more intense prostate stimulation. All in all, I would have to say that I would recommend the SGX only to those who have experienced consistent discomfort with the MGX, (which judging from the comments in this forum, haven't been that many, given the appropriate amount of time and proper techniques).

Hope this helps,

B Mayfield

Thanks B !



   
ReplyQuote
(@morethrottle)
Active Member Customer
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 3
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I bought the MGX about a year ago. Have used it with limited success unless I add manual stimulation and pull it out a little. Seems to me the SGX model or as I have read elsewhere on this sight the new and improved MGX is the right choice. My original version of the MGX pentrates too deeply and misses the prostate. AS well, I have had to modify the external tab so that it stays closer to the "million dollar spot" of the perimium. Because of it's length and curvature, it slides to one side of the other of the base of my cock. My next update will be after I have purchased and used the SGX... with true side-by-side comparisons.

Otherwise, great product and nice to know there are other st8 guys who enjoy anal/prostate stimulation.



   
ReplyQuote
B Mayfield
(@b-mayfield)
Member Adventurer Registered
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 2118
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Both the SGX and the new MGX address the abutment tab issues of the old MGX very well! The tab is shorter and engages lower on the perineum,...right on the Sweet Spot. I have noticed that the new MGX seems just slightly shorter to me and a little less aggressive (owing in part to the lack of knobs on the end). If you are really concerned about the length of the device however, your needs might be better served by the SGX, which is definitely shorter than both of the MGX units and is also somewhat smaller in circumference (girth).

Cheers,

B Mayfield



   
ReplyQuote
Share: