AI Assistant
Helix or Progasm ?-...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Helix or Progasm ?-gctid5320


(@Anonymous)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I got my Progasm today and all I could think was, it's quite large! But I cant wait to give it a try. My question is
should I start with the Progasm and then switch to my Helix or the other way around? Or just pick one for the whole session?



   
Quote
 RJT
(@rjt)
Member Adventurer
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 37
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Given your reaction of "it's quite large", I'd suggest for the first session try warming up with the Helix and then switch to the Progasm. That should make the insertion a little easier.

Once you're used to it try either way and see what works best for you.



   
ReplyQuote
(@bridgework)
New Member Customer
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 3
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

RJT
Thanks! I went for the Progasm first, I realy had to take time and ease into it. after the first inch or so the Progasm took it apon it's self to do the rest! After a while I switched over to the Helix and it was quite a great feeling. I will have to try the other way next.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: