Progasm vs. MGX

Ok, so I had an MGX for about 2 years. Got rid of it a while ago, but kind of regret it now. I was able to easily reach some pretty intense highs with it, but never a super-O. I could bring myself almost to orgasm without any penile contact easily. Actually orgasming took a little effort, but I could still achieve a "Super-T" every session. There were a couple occasions where it felt like I was orgasming, but nothing was coming out.

I'm considering replacing it.>
Those are the orgasms that allow you to have more than one, and the best kind to have in my opinion!

My question is: Is it easier to achieve a Super-T with a Progasm than an MGX? I found the MGX to be a little on the 'unfulfilling' side, and the dimensions of the Progasm aren't intimidating to me.

I'm 5' 5-1/2".

Opinions? Advice?

IMHO...Having a super T is easier than having a super o...What is your goal? If it's to have a super o, then consider avoiding the super T on a regular basis and let your prostate orgasms be your fulfillment! In time, they can keep getting better and better!

TG

orgasming with nothing coming out IS whats suppose to happen. If something comes, like ejaculate, then thats just a traditional orgasm. Sounds to me like you have already had some prostate orgasms but didnt realize it. Remember that the definition of a super O is just a "different" kind of orgasm, doesnt mean necessarily that it will be a thousand times better then a traditional orgasm, just different. As for a new device, I think the maximus is considered the larger version of the MGX so that would be more fulfilling.

I also was not happy with the MGX. I moved to the Helix and began having excellent results. I also have the Progasm Red. It is large, but is my favorite after to use after the Helix.

I found that the Helix put more direct pressure on the prostate than MGX. Progasm is longer and has much much more direct stimulation than anything else.

I suspect that much of the differences are subtle and it maybe more about the possibility of a "better" tool for the job than the tool itself. Don't get me wrong they are different, but your muscle control and mental preparedness are more important. I see rewiring as a two step process: First is to build pelvic, anal and sphincter muscle control as well as prostate awareness. That is why you have to practice and have 1 to 1.5hr sessions every other day or so. Second is opening your mind to the pleasure and being able to "fall into pleasure and allow it to come to you" instead of forcing the pleasure and holding expectations and agendas.

That is what has worked for me.

The first unit I ever had was the Helix. Being new to the whole thing, I
didn't keep it around for long. I was all hyped up and had huge
expectations, but they weren't met and I ended up throwing it away. I
found it kind of dug in at the uppermost point, and was a bit
uncomfortable. I've bought a couple MGX clones off eBay, had a few
sessions with them, then came to the conclusion that the end result is
the same or less than a normal orgasm and threw them away also.
Therefore, it doesn't feel like it's worth the gross preparation
routine, the time it takes to reach the climax, and the cleaning that
follows. I don't know why I keep coming back; just relentless, I guess.

To be honest, I've used the following (in this order):
Helix
Angled G-spot vibe
SGX clone (too short)
MGX clone
Classix Prostate Stimulator (garbage, doesn't even stay in)
MGX clone

With
the practice I've had, I can actually have a hands-free orgasm without
using anything. It's all to do with stomach and anal/PC contractions,
leg movements, and strong focused arousal. I've given up pursuit of the
fabled 'Super-O'. If I buy another device, it will be because I just
like the feeling of something there and building up to near-orgasmic
states.

Just wanted to know if its easier to reach those states with a Progasm than with the MGX.

Can anyone answer that?