Male Orientation?

I think we are all, if we admit it, somewhere on a continuum between hetero and homo, and different place at different times of our life, very close to either end or somewhere in between. Sexual pleasure is rather blind, it doesn't particularly care where (whom) it cums from.

As a hetro man I can honestly say that I have the odd fantasy about being 'taken' when writhing like a loon in the height of aneros induced mayhem. Although I couldn't put this into practice as I'm not attracted to men at all.It certainly doesn't gross me out, in fact I find it quite erotic at the time. I'm sure there are others who get a kick out of this..??

Perhaps, the straight men that are questioning their sexual orientation, are using Aneros as an Agent Provacateur. They have wanted to be with a man, prior to their Aneros use. I'm extremely fond of my Progasm Classic! But I don't want to be with a man. I would even let my GF peg me, but I still would not want to be with a man. I don't see how anal stimulation and/or prostate stimulation, could get a supposedly straight man, to change his sexual orientation.

I think the OP was making the point that straight men overcoming the taboo of using their ass to achieve pleasure was to be applauded. Having fantasies while experiencing anal pleasure is a personal thing. I get aroused by thinking that I'm being fucked by a man, but I would not want it to happen in reality. Whatever floats your boat..! If my prostate gland was in my ear, I'd be sticking something in that. Would probably be deaf by now though lol..!

I couldn't agree more Bunk with your statement from yesterday. In my limited experiences with my helix I have found my mind screaming "Yes, f@&$ my ass" while having a Dry O though I also am not attracted to men. But being "taken" at that moment is incredibly arousing.

I think we are all, if we admit it, somewhere on a continuum between hetero and homo, and different place at different times of our life, very close to either end or somewhere in between. Sexual pleasure is rather blind, it doesn't particularly care where (whom) it cums from.

I read about this experiment done where baby goats were raised by sheep, when they turned adult and were put back with the goats, the males still only wanted to mate with the sheep, while the females were able to adapt. Likewise with humans men are very much fixed in their sexuality/preference, while women are very flexible. So a women with a high sexdrive is bi, she doesn't care where the sex comes from, sex independent. While hetero and gay men and lesbians oddly enough it's fixed on their preference.
Perhaps if boys were allowed to use the Aneros in their formative years they'd become as flexible as women in their sexuality encompassing all types hetero, gay, pedo

@Ehm, I have to disagree with you. I think people are born with their attraction to males or females. I don't think that can be influenced per say. Not to say women dont sleep with women just for the fun of sex and the stimulation, but are they really physically attracted to them? Same applies for male on male. I've noticed alot of men on here say they are curious or fantasize about sex with a "penis" but not a male. There is a difference to them almost like they see the penis as something completely unrelated to the male body it is attached to. And of course these same people always say towards the end that they are not attracted to the male physique. So from my perspective curiosity and fantasy can only get you so far but in reality it isnt going to change your attraction to the person.

I agree totally with ineverknew. In my opinion, I believe if a man is hetero-sexual he would not fantasize about being with a man. Take hetero porn, for instance, and notice men's penises, touching other men's penises. This is seen in double penetration scenes, and 2 penises in the same orifice scenes (vaginal, oral, anal). No straight man would allow his penis to ever touch another man's penis. A Super O, lower case o, capital O, Cheeri-o, Spaghetti-o, or any kind of other O, is not going to change one's sexual orientation. Aneros, Njoy, dildos, vibrators, etc, are not going to change a man's sexual orientation. Excuses, excuses. Oh well!

The semantics of this or that category are not important. The great thing about the aneros is that it puts you into an orgasmic zone (O-zone) where your imagination is the limit. Explore whatever you want.

In my case, the other night, with the aid of my faithful single toke of weed, I transformed into a female hooker (I had been reading a really cool --and sad-- novel about them). It was fascinating to get (vaginally) fucked separately by two clients, and feel how different their bodies and styles were. The first was a jock with a strong body, lot of dark pubes, big cock, and a long firm stroke. The second was a skinny red headed kid with pale skin, red pubes and a small cock, who pistoned into me rapidly, while squirming around on top of me, fingering my nipples.

crazy, but.. intense! they both had me coming wildly, though in different ways.

i know that hookers probably don't come, because it is just business. but, hey, it was my fantasy so anything could happen, and at that moment, being her was awesome.

darwin

@darwin

Actually, the semantics are quite germane. The question being: So after you have had your mini-o & super-o,
what is your sexual orientation now? I have no problem with weed smoking, but... if only after ONE hit of reefer, you fantasize about being a female hooker, you really should cease smoking. JMO.

@darwin, you have some of the wildest fantasies! I can barely picture a naked woman lol. I think my brain is broken in the fantasy department :-/

I agree totally with ineverknew. In my opinion, I believe if a man is hetero-sexual he would not fantasize about being with a man. Take hetero porn, for instance, and notice men's penises, touching other men's penises. This is seen in double penetration scenes, and 2 penises in the same orifice scenes (vaginal, oral, anal). No straight man would allow his penis to ever touch another man's penis. A Super O, lower case o, capital O, Cheeri-o, Spaghetti-o, or any kind of other O, is not going to change one's sexual orientation. Aneros, Njoy, dildos, vibrators, etc, are not going to change a man's sexual orientation. Excuses, excuses. Oh well!

So I'm not heterosexual then, ah well, live and let live I say. Any suggestions on how I break this news to my wife..?

@Bunk

What you do or do not tell your wife, is your business. Should you tell her, you fantasize about being taken by a man, it may not go well for you. I used to date this bird, and when she found out I stimulated my prostate, she wanted to involve one of her friends, in the equation. A dude, with titties bolted on. She kept saying, he was really feminine, and quite womanly.
I found that rather odd , thus I had to part ways with her, as she became too insistent ,about me meeting him. Oh well.

I'm heterosexual and it still hasn't changed over seven plus years in this journey. I have wonderful fantasies of women strapping on a dildo and pegging me. But that works because they are women. I'm still not attracted sexually to men. I just love me some anal and prostate play whether solo or with a woman.

@Love_is
HA HA! MY POINT EXACTLY. Excellent post. Thank you.

@Ehm, I have to disagree with you. I think people are born with their attraction to males or females. I don't think that can be influenced per say. Not to say women dont sleep with women just for the fun of sex and the stimulation, but are they really physically attracted to them? Same applies for male on male. I've noticed alot of men on here say they are curious or fantasize about sex with a "penis" but not a male. There is a difference to them almost like they see the penis as something completely unrelated to the male body it is attached to. And of course these same people always say towards the end that they are not attracted to the male physique. So from my perspective curiosity and fantasy can only get you so far but in reality it isnt going to change your attraction to the person.

So how do you explain the fact that when pederast have sex with children these children often becomes pederasts themselves?
I do believe after a certain age males sexuality is fixed when the developmental phase has past, but the fact that twins can have different sexual orientations suggests that there's more than genes that play a part(if at all)
Because my sexuality is fixed I have to have a convoluted phantasy, i.e. that it's myself fucking my feminine part coz it's the only way I'm not revolted as anything male (except myself) is disgusting. But that to me shows that had my developmental phase been different I could have been bi at the very least and I would have had the sexual freedom to phantasize about a man fucking me.

I'm sure it's a biological fact that women are more flexible not just goats but humans as well.

@ehm, i think we are talking about two different things here. Your talking about sex and I'm talking about attraction. You can have sex with a person and enjoy it yet not be attracted to them. My only point is that I believe attraction is something we are born with and for most does not change. Talking about sexuality in pre-pubescent children is kinda pointless as their brains are not fully developed and they do not fully comprehend. Looking at humans as flexible, yes they are. But society as a norm tend to be largely hetero. Individuals who have sex with animals or dead people are extremely flexible (LOL) but in the larger picture of society tend to be looked at as freaks of nature. Even homosexuality is a much smaller percentage of society then what the media would have us believe. Not that I am against homosexuality, not at all, but it doesnt perpetuate the species.

I think we're both talking about sexual attraction. And I'm not talking so much about sexuality in children(what sexuality?) but more that there's a developmental phase that shapes men's sexuality for the rest of their lifes. And all the example beastiality/necrophilia shows is that yes you can basically develop attraction to anything, it's not that people are born with that gene it's more that they've had an unusual sexual development phase.
Also I don't believe sex in humans has procreation as its main goal, otherwise we'd do and feel like it much less(only when the female is fertile). The main goal of sex is pleasure and social bonding(that's probably why homosexuality was common in Ancient Greece as fuckbrothers in arms had some added value)

@Ehm
I find your posts, to be quite dubious, as well as troubling. The majority of homosexuality, in Ancient Greece (from what I've read), was between ADULT men and PUBESCENT boys. This is nothing to be lauded. Am I to gather, that you would find this behavior acceptable today, as well?

"I think people are born with their attraction to males or females. I don't think that can be influenced per say." Quoting from @Pspotsquirter.
Yet another recent study has not determined this. It seems as if upbringing and environment play a part as well. The research came out this month I did not bother to note the reference. I think the plasticity of human sexual relationships has contributed to our survival. As mentioned the bonding mechanism in sex is an extremely vital survival component. It may be greater than our sexual inclination. The imagination in a 100% heterosexual male can generate, more so in arousal, the feeling of being F-----d because of its incredible ability to put itself in the place of a female and feel what it might be like as a female. This amazing ability of being able to put oneself in another's situation and then seen oneself from that position is what makes us human.
I often wonder in erotic literature that the male arousal is more about what the female is receiving than the male is giving.

@Ehm, Developmental phase or not, I still believe we are born with our attraction to either females or males from birth. Your right, procreation is not the main goal, but when the majority is considered straight it does perpepuate the species. If the majority was homosexual then we would be in trouble of extinction. I suspect the amount of male greeks having sex with young boys was probably low, statistically anyways.

@ineverknew. Perhaps in a society that was homo orientated the environment would be safer so the heteros would be able to have more children who would have a higher survival rate.

@isvara, not sure I see where your coming from.

I suppose I am off topic, but human sexuality on average is not cut and dried. An interesting article in a reputed science journal said that in all species there is about 10% same sex orientation. The article suggested that this 10% created a defense ring around the community. The article was well researched but the flock of offended arose on mass like seagull to slaughter it. It was a pity because there was much of value to be considered.
My comments it that the process of life will adjust to maintain a species if that species is contributing to Life. It's the contribution we should be worrying about not our sexual orientation.
PS its early morning, I can't sleep, so I am writing this ..!

@isvara, I'm still not sure I understand. But I dont think many people feel comforted or threatened by anyones sexual orientation when it comes to children. Sure there are people who hate homosexuals. There will always be haters and racists. It amazes me that in this modern day people can really hate someone based on skin color or sexual orientation.

I'm still straight but far more receptive to a pounding by any object whether it be a peg, aneros, or phallus and I can now relate to gay people and women who love anal stimulation as I’m now a fan too. 🙂

~Trei

I still consider myself straight, but I would be down for experimenting with the right trans girl. Even that is arguably still pretty much 'straight' activity though.

Perhaps, the straight men that are questioning their sexual orientation, are using Aneros as an Agent Provacateur. They have wanted to be with a man, prior to their Aneros use. I'm extremely fond of my Progasm Classic! But I don't want to be with a man. I would even let my GF peg me, but I still would not want to be with a man. I don't see how anal stimulation and/or prostate stimulation, could get a supposedly straight man, to change his sexual orientation. I 2nd this .. I feel the same way ..i also have a programs which I enjoy and into pegging but will never be with a man

the difference of being gay or straight is WHO you choose to have sex with NOT how the sexual pleasure is being received .. this seems to be miscontrued alot

It seems to me the poll would be enhanced if the question was asked, "What do you consider your sexual orientation to be before...." and then the after question.