Love my HC. Is the Helix Syn that much different? Would another device in Syn be worth it?
I currently have a Eupho, Helix Classic and Progasm.
I'm intrigued by the difference in texture.
Love my HC. Is the Helix Syn that much different? Would another device in Syn be worth it?
I currently have a Eupho, Helix Classic and Progasm.
I'm intrigued by the difference in texture.
I started with a Helix classic like 5 years ago and made only little progress with it. Then I got me the Peridise and then the Eupho-Syn. Both are milestones of my journey, esp. the Eupho-Syn which gave me my first Super-O on the very first ride. You may read this forum entry for more details.
So, the different texture is a big plus for me, I really like it. Syn models generally seem to have softer P-Tab-Arms, that makes them act more like a pulling spring. That results in a lively and bouncy behaviour of the massager but generates less pressure on your perineum. I don't own an Helix-Syn, but from what I remember reading in the forums, it is slightly reshaped and has a thinner stem than the Classic.
So in summary Syn models seem to be more about generating feelings through movement than pressure.
Cheers, Unfug
I have used both. IMO it much depends on your sweet-spot anatomy.
The p-tab on the syn is extremely flexible. I have been unable to locate my sweet spot, but think I'm close. So I feel that I need a p-tab which is far more aggressive than the syn offers. For this reason, I have just ordered the Eupho rather than Eupho-syn.