Hi.
There is an entry about the history of Aneros on the wiki. I have a few additional questions about this topic:
"1994 - A Japanese urologist contacts Japanese American inventor Jiro Takashima regarding the development of an in-home prostate massager for his patients with prostatitis and BPH."
I understand that it might not be possible to answer all questions, but it would be nice if someone with insider knowledge could shed light on some:
- Why did the Japanese urologist choose Jiro Takashima specifically in favor of other inventors / engineers? Did they know each other or did Mr. Takashima have specific knowledge in the design of medical devices, etc.?
- Did either of the men have personal experience with their prostate being massaged and maybe even experienced a super O? Did the urologist know about prostate pleasure from reports by his patients?
- Did they correspond with each other during the development of the first massager?
- Did Mr. Takashima get instructions on how prostate massage is performed in a medical setting? Did he study the anatomy and physiology of the rectum / prostate? Did he study CT images, anatomy books, etc? With natural deviations in anatomy between different people, how did they establish an "average" anatomy of the rectum, such that the massager can be used by many people? Or was the process more "trial and error"
- What was the starting point of the design? Was the first idea a manual device, similar in function to the Njoy Pure Wand, or did they envision a hands-free device from the beginning? In the case of a manual device as starting point: At which point during the development was the idea about a hands-free device conceived? (With the Perineum Tab as fulcrum)
- How were prototypes built? Were they made from wood (and maybe coated) or were they already molded? How was medical safety achieved, while still allowing a reasonably quick iteration time (for example putting it into a condom)?
- How did Mr. Takashima test the prototypes? By himself or with volunteers? Did he send prototypes to the urologist to get feedback?
- I understand that the original device was geared towards medical use, but did anyone experience prostate pleasure or even a super O as a side effect during development? Did anyone experience involuntary contractions and automatic movement of the device during development?
- This is probably my main question: How did the specific shape of the original massager evolve from prototype into the final shape during first release? What were the factors that influenced the shape?
If possible, I am also interested in how some of these questions could be answered at the current day: Do the engineers at Aneros have specific knowledge about which part of the geometry is responsible for a certain effect (changing one part could have an effect on multiple behaviors). How are prototypes built and tested? Do you use computer models or simulations?
Thank you
Good questions...with all the sex topic podcasts out there, I wish someone would do some interviews to follow up on them. Language might be a challenge, but I would love to know more the development of Aneros also. I have heard Forrest Andrews tell his story many times.
Yes, verrrry interesting questions.
I can't help thinking that if someone has access to Forrest Andrews, perhaps they can ask him about some of this. He might know some HIH people that could be decent references or sources of info. Just a thought.
Like a lot of other things,it was likely designed purely to relieve bhp symptoms and the pleasure side was discovered my accident. Just like the magic wand which was to relieve muscles issues,and viagra which was a heart patient medicine only,until guys reported sporting long lasting erections lol.
Thanks for the answers... Basically, I'm hoping that someone at the company gets note of this thread and can hopefully answer some of the questions 🙂
Like a lot of other things,it was likely designed purely to relieve bhp symptoms and the pleasure side was discovered my accident.
I also believe that the pleasure side was discovered as a side effect from the medical application. The question is whether there were potentially early indicators of the pleasure side during development, or if this really crystalized only after the release of the first product.
And it's very interesting to know where the idea about a hands-free massager came from.
I remember reading that the inventor took some convincing to approve of the promotion of the devices as erotic toys, but in the end he was okay with it. Some of your questions may be answered by that.
I think there could be some answers in this video series, you can use the auto generated subtitles, they are quite a mess but much better than nothing. Interview Part 1 of 5
Good luck !
Thanks for the video. The auto-generated subtitles didn't help much, but it was very interesting to see the different versions lined up. I also found the site that is mentioned in the video description. And here is the google translation, which is better than the one in the video
Just imagine the reaction of the first person that accidentally crossed into a Super-O! Makes me think of the side effect disclaimers in pharma commercials; "side effects may include intense white hot pleasure. A closer connection to the universe is also possible as well as loss of sense of time." Haha!
This is an interview with Forrest Andrews [the interview starts at 21 min 15 sec]:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtnGILkHfYc
You can find other interviews with him online.