Foreskin Restoration & Prostate Connection

Posted by: @7sdoor

Has anyone out there restored their foreskin and found more pleasure in Aneros?

You might find this thread from 12 years ago interesting -> Foreskin Restoration - Restoration of the World.

Good Vibes to You!

I don’t touch my penis in session. I took the don’t touch very seriously. I don’t plan to in the future either. Can’t have anything getting in the way of work. Besides,gotta keep something back for the wife. She does the penis massage. I do the A-Less work,everyone’s a winner.

Posted by: @rumel

Posted by: @7sdoor

Has anyone out there restored their foreskin and found more pleasure in Aneros?

You might find this thread from 12 years ago interesting -> Foreskin Restoration - Restoration of the World.

Good Vibes to You!

Thanks @rumel! That’s a good thread.

Posted by: @helghast

I don’t touch my penis in session. I took the don’t touch very seriously. I don’t plan to in the future either. Can’t have anything getting in the way of work. Besides,gotta keep something back for the wife. She does the penis massage. I do the A-Less work,everyone’s a winner.

@helghast

I get that, but I’m not even referring to touching my penis in session. I leave mine alone in an  Aneros session also. However, even working my foreskin at various times throughout the day has enhanced my feelings inside a session.

@7sdoor whatever is furthering your along is fine by me. Good luck.

@7sdoor

I am uncircumcised and can tell you that in my penis play reaching MMOs and ruined orgasms with nipple play, coronal ridge play, frenulum play, there are sometimes when I am aroused and orgasmic that simple pleasure on my retracted foreskin that rolls back or bunches back- - - putting pressures on that roll of foreskin brings me unbelievable joy and pleasure.  I have read that the Meissner cells are neurological cells in the foreskin.  Whatever they are, I am glad for the pleasure my foreskin gives me in solo play along with nipple play and firing up my prostate.

As to circumcised guys restoring and the pleasure you describe, so much of pleasure is in the mind and our focus on that pleasure.  I hope someone here can answer.  I have a good pal who has posted a few posts here and has restored his foreskin.  I haven't asked him what differences he has felt but I can ask him to see your question.  He is rewired to the max.  

“I never gave it a second thought...”

In the thread that @Rumel recommends there are many interesting insights. I find most notable the one written by a certain @badger (before he brings religion in the picture), who says that when he was circumcised as an adult, he realized that there were advantages and disadvantages to both being circumcised and being uncircumcised. He then states that people often think that the grass is greener on the other side, which is very true.

If you don’t have a problem is it really necessary to fix it? Is further genital alteration necessary to “fix” what isn’t broken? 

Our prostate journeys teach us that it isn’t the amount of nerve endings we have, rather, it is how our brain interprets the stimulation that gives us more or less pleasure. I think the idea of re-creating the foreskin to have more sensitivity is a very penile centric way of thinking.  It is the idea that more is more, which is not always the case. 

I heard a very interesting podcast on excision, which is a widely spread practice in parts of Africa as well as certain parts of South East Asia.  I won’t go into the details of the varying degrees of excision, which you can read about online, but often excision involves removing the external clitoris (it can involve much worse as well...) What was especially interesting was the part of the podcast about reconstructive surgery. It is possible for surgeons nowadays to externalize parts of the internal clitoris (the clit is like an iceberg of which we only see a small portion) of an excised woman, thus creating a new clitoris which is exposed.  This is certainly a revolution in plastic surgery. However, there are critics to these operations.  These critics don’t say these operations should not be done. Rather, they (often excised women themselves) say that the excised women who don’t have the operation done are not in any way broken.  The argument is that instead of having further invasive surgery—albeit this time chosen by the patient—one can learn how to love one’s body as it is.  Clitoral pleasure isn’t the only valid form of pleasure, and there’s so much more to explore. 

I am vehemently against excision, of course, and I have mixed feelings about circumcision. As a circumcised man I see the benefits of simple hygiene (my penis has no smell or smegma). I don’t see any negative effects.  For everyone who says that the penis is much more sensitive when uncircumcised, my reply is that sensitivity is in the brain.  The reason why I have mixed feelings about circumcision is because I don’t think any baby should be cut against their will, and thus I think it should be an adult surgery (which no one would get I imagine).

As the OP states, I too never gave my own circumcision second thought. I first read about foreskin stretching on this forum a year ago, and my opinion has not been swayed. If I wanted to “correct” the decision of my American parents, I would have to deal with the baggage of not accepting my body the way it is.  I would spend time and effort wearing and cleaning the “corrective” apparatus.  And I would also set myself up for possible disappointment with results.  I prefer spending my energy creating positive sexuality for myself, not trying to undo something I don’t find wrong with myself in the first place.

Sorry if that deviated from the initial question, which I didn’t respond to at all, but I just wanted to write my opinion on the matter of foreskin restoration.

Posted by: @divine_o

  For everyone who says that the penis is much more sensitive when uncircumcised, my reply is that sensitivity is in the brain.  

How can one say that his uncircumcised member is more sensitive than my circumcised version?  He can only compare both scenarios for himself after going through the cut procedure as an adult. 

I can't tell how someone else feels pleasure no matter how experienced I am in the type of pleasure we're discussing or any other for that matter. 

@divine_o, well said!

There is a nerve running on the underside of the penis. It ends at the top of the foreskin. If you pinch it or rub it between your fingers, you should feel a tingling sensation at the base of penis. I've been able make myself cum by stimulating the line, and I made a point not to touch the shaft or glans. It doesn't feel amazing, semen just pours out.

The idea that a clitoris has x times more nerve endings than a penis is mostly true for circumcised men.

I've been semi-restoring for years and have full coverage under certain circumstances but I always use a tape ring when walking about in cloths to keep from rubbing on the cloths. I am very lucky to have an intact frenulum. I haven't noticed a connection with the restored foreskin and Aneros use but love the look of my supple pink head.

Posted by: @airbag

If you pinch it or rub it between your fingers, you should feel a tingling sensation at the base of penis. I've been able make myself cum by stimulating the line, and I made a point not to touch the shaft or glans. It doesn't feel amazing, semen just pours out.

After several weeks of SR, I was due for a TO release so I used your method with great results!   

The nice part about achieving orgasm through frenulum skin stimulation is that I often orgasm while still being flaccid.   As you mentioned, this method produces oodles of semen and the orgasm itself is at least twice as long as the traditional one.

Thanks for sharing