Hey you, thanks for opening this topic!
Since I know your time´s precious, I´ll try to keep it as short as possible. In medias res:
When I came back from my summer holiday, I hadn´t ejaculated for a week and was very horny, which lead to the following event. I came back home and when I had time for myself, I slipped my aneros in and enjoyed the feeling. Someone in the forum mentioned, that the device´s more an arousal amplificator than an arousal creator, which I can agree to.
Now, I had the aneros in and wanted to go, so I massaged my penis like I do when I masturbate, although there was no hurry, I was just deeply enjoying everything and focused on both sensations equally, concerning the "front" and the "back". After some time, I got the feeling that I stood right in front of the point of no return, so I clamped my musculus pubococcygeus, the "pc-muscle", as hard as I could, while clamping my whole body as well in a very strong way.
(I read about this muscle in a book, where someone taught men how to have multiple orgasms only by preventing the ejaculation with the tecnique of clamping this special muscle, no prostate involved at all.)
You can imagine that clamping the pc-muscle forced the aneros to go down on my prostate even harder and I focused on the interior feelings in this moments. When I was sure, i wouldn´t ejaculate if i released again, I did release the muscle and had nearly the same contractions in my pelvic region as I normally have while ejaculating. I had orgasmic feelings the whole time and could reproduce this on and on, I think I did for nearly 1 hour. I was bathing in my sweat, and though I didn´t have this kind of release I enjoy when ejaculating, I had highly pleasureable feelings.
Now, is this a super O? Because if it is, I would definetly recommend this to the newbies. I never had much feelings with the "do nothing" approaches or the slight contractions, but by simply "forcing it" and involving my penis I hit some spots I never recognized before.
Has someone experienced similar feelings?
Thank you for your time and help, I appreciate that.
Love to you
hakuna
[h=3][/h]
@hakuna1 Super Os. Well when every ones super O is different or idea of one is, then its hard to say. If you do you get shot down by others.Everytime i know what one is it is put into question by another different super orgasm or someones description of one. ( There seems to be endless amounts of types of Super O)
On the surface at least I guess you could call a dry orgasm DRY O a super O if it was better than "normal".
So if you have what you described, which sounds like Multiple cascading Dry Os. Is this not super?
Better than a dry O coz theres heaps of them? Better than a ejaculation coz you where orgasming for 1 hour?
Now there is something to think about....
Maybe it was a super O "if you think it was" maybe there is something better you have not felt yet which is the super O. To that point will you ever know coz if you do feel something better, then is that the super O??? 🙁
It is the ingenious marketing of Aneros! Its not a lie but its not measurable either! Every person is trying to get to the promised super O land but there is no solid foundation to say where that is.
Hope i have not lots you.
I think this is the reason that the likes of @BMayfield and others can never give a straight answer exactly and they always say "Dont get caught up on naming or classifying the type of orgasm, just enjoy the ride instead"
I guess no one else knows for sure how good (super) your orgasm was?
While i know this did not answer your question maybe it explains why your question can not be answered.... Its crazy dude! ~X(
hakuna1,
.... Its crazy dude! ~X(Yes it is but we do have a pretty good working definition for what constitutes a Super-O that allows for a great deal of flexibility for ones experiences. IMHO, the two key identifying aspects of a Super-O is that it is a non-ejaculatory event and that it is distinctly different from one's normal ejaculatory orgasmic experience of a few seconds of pleasure with accompanying spasmodic contractions.
When I was sure, i wouldn´t ejaculate if i released again, I did release the muscle and had nearly the same contractions in my pelvic region as I normally have while ejaculating.OK, you were definitely having an orgasm and it was a dry-O (matches key aspect #1).I had orgasmic feelings the whole time and could reproduce this on and on, I think I did for nearly 1 hour.OK, this matches key aspect #2.
I was bathing in my sweat, and though I didn´t have this kind of release I enjoy when ejaculating, I had highly pleasureable feelings.OK, this goes back to matching key aspect #1. If you had experienced a dry-O via a retrograde ejaculation you would have probably induced the normal hormonal cascade leading into a refractory period but that did NOT happen. You were still in the orgasmic zone experiencing pleasure for many minutes, your body was sweating and I am willing to bet your heart rate and blood pressure were elevated as well, all indicators of continuous orgasm.Now, is this a super O?IMHO, from your description of things,YES, it was.
I think what is important to note here is the admonition for newbie users to avoid touching their penis is not to stop them from using it as a source of arousal generation but to discourage them from using it to stimulate themselves past the point of no return into the traditional ejaculatory pathway. @Cockadoodle's thread Penis, NOT makes the reasoning behind this clear and I encourage all newbies to read it.
Good Vibes to You !
Going on what @Rumel has pointed out its sound like a super O. And he is one of those people that i would listen too. He has helped me since my start 3 years ago.Thats not to say what i said was wrong.
Snippets from the wiki to support what i said.
Super-O's come in all shapes and sizes. Some are small, some are large, some are single, some are multiple, some are centered in one area while others are in another. Some are particularly intense, while others are more subdued. The Super-O is very personal and different for each individual.
There is ambiguity on the Aneros forum about what is and is not a Super-O.
Rumel is so good with word to.
Its been good to go back and reread the wiki to reinforce what super O can be. It has reassured me that I have had many different types of super O despite what others have said.
Thanks Rumel
Thank you very much for your time and wise words! 🙂
I will think about your posts and take my time to practice and reflect upon these. Have a nice evening!
Love to you