AI Assistant
Controlling inserti...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Controlling insertion depth


 Earl
(@earl)
Active Member Customer
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 8
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I initially found the Helix to be less pleasurable than the MGX, but spyeg's blog mentioned not inserting all the way to the t-handle for optimal P-spot contact. I tried keeping it about a 1/4" from fully inserted and it did improve things noticeably, but that required too much manual attention to keep it there. Any cleaver ideas on how to maintain it just sort of fully inserted? I have made a spacer that I plan to try at the first opportunity, but would like to hear of any other good ideas. Thanks for any input!



   
Quote
(@pommie)
Noble Member Customer
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 996
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

@Earl,

It's my belief that the Aneros tools best designed to target the Prostate are the MGX and the SGX. If you find that the MGX is missing the target by going in too deep, you might be better of with the SGX which is a bit smaller.

It strikes me that the other models are less specific and tend to stimulate the whole of the anal canal region, albeit including the prostate as part of the picture to a greater or lesser extent.

Good luck and enjoy whatever comes your way.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: