So I came up with an alternative way of masturbating that's different from the typical up-down stroking of the penis. I'll try to describe it.
I wrap my fist around the shaft of my penis, with the index finger a bit below where the head of the penis starts.
Using my thumb, I rub the the side of the head that's opposite to the frenulum. I make sure to rub the "ridge" that's at the bottom of the head with a bit of force.
I do my best to avoid any stimulation to the area around the frenulum.
Maybe a partner's tongue could be a nice substitute for your thumb.
What's so interesting about this? Well, first of all I'm a newbie at MMO. I'm not yet able to achieve dry-orgasms. I like experimenting with different techniques though, and I can usually generate nice sensations no matter what technique I decide to use. If I remain relaxed for a while I often experience p-waves as well. The reason why I found this technique so interesting is that it just seems very effective compared to all the other techniques I've tried. It feels pretty good right away and I start making involuntary body movements and weird sounds. Then soon enough I get to the point where it's just too intense to continue, I feel overwhelmed (I'd describe it as more "intense" rather than "pleasant"). This has happened with other techniques as well, but with this one it happens very fast. I need to learn how to relax through the intense sensations, but it's difficult!
My theory what is going on here is that we're utilizing the penis' built-in function to generate arousal, but since the area around the frenulum is avoided, it doesn't build towards ejaculation. This made me curious if this can be used as "shortcut" to achieve dry-orgasms. They probably wouldn't be as satisfying as real prostate orgasms, but it could be a stepping stone for people who haven't learned how to have prostate orgasms yet. This also reminds me about what many women describe going through, with having to overcome the "too intense" phase before learning to orgasm. So maybe this is a way for men to experience something similar to clitoral orgasms? Do you think there's any sense to my theory, or is it just nonsense?
I'd like to know if anyone of you have any experience with using a technique such as this one. If not, it would be greatly appreciated if you could try it out and report back the results. I want to know whether it's easier to achieve dry-orgasms this way (which would prove my theory about using the built-in arousal generator in the penis without triggering ejaculation). Also curious how the orgasms feels like compared to wet-o/other types of dry-os.
@throwawayacc Great post! I'm sure many of us guys will be trying this! BTW, have you used this technique with lube (or dry)? And are you rubbing up/down or side/side?
@goldenboy I'm actually rubbing the foreskin over the ridge because I happen to be very sensitive in that area. The motion I use is up/down, it seems to work the best, but side/side or circular is alright too. Keep in mind I just discovered this technique so there's still a lot of experimentation to do.
Maybe you had what the guy in this move had. Watch till the end. They call it male squirting!!! Never had this, but I'm trying
And it feels very good. Especially after some time (say half hour)
http://nl.m.xhamster.com/movies/3856490/huge_male_squirt_watch_to_the_end.html
Hey @throwawayacc,
My theory what is going on here is that we're utilizing the penis' built-in function to generate arousal, but since the area around the frenulum is avoided, it doesn't build towards ejaculation. This made me curious if this can be used as "shortcut" to achieve dry-orgasms. They probably wouldn't be as satisfying as real prostate orgasms, but it could be a stepping stone for people who haven't learned how to have prostate orgasms yet. This also reminds me about what many women describe going through, with having to overcome the "too intense" phase before learning to orgasm. So maybe this is a way for men to experience something similar to clitoral orgasms? Do you think there's any sense to my theory, or is it just nonsense?
Your discovery and description is pretty spot on. I can back this up with my personal experience (see the links below).
I'd like to know if anyone of you have any experience with using a technique such as this one. If not, it would be greatly appreciated if you could try it out and report back the results. I want to know whether it's easier to achieve dry-orgasms this way (which would prove my theory about using the built-in arousal generator in the penis without triggering ejaculation). Also curious how the orgasms feels like compared to wet-o/other types of dry-os.
Yes, see this thread and this one for answers! It might be a bit disappointing to discover, that you "only" re-invented the wheel, but on the other hand you'll get confirmation and guidance about the things you just discovered. 🙂
I wouldn't recommend that approach for newbies though (like you suggested). There is the danger of messing up proper re-wiring. But you might consider reading this book:
Eso: How You and Your Lover Can Give Each Other Hours of Extended Sexual Orgasm
It more or less tackles the subject, that we in this forum regard to as Super-O. I'm only halfway through, but it has a chapter (which I havn't read yet) how to stimulate the prostate and the penis to achieve it. Since this method has been around for some time now and has proven to be reliably successful (according to the authors), I'd suggest this approach.
Big shoutout to the person who recommended this book in the first place. Unfortunately I can't find the relevant thread anymore, because ESO is too short for the forum search. 🙁 (maybe @rumel can help out, or as I like to call him secretly: the living and walking archive 😉 )
Cheers, Unfug
Big shoutout to the person who recommended this book in the first place. Unfortunately I can't find the relevant thread anymore, because ESO is too short for the forum search.
Though the title was shortened there, credit for this actually goes to @darwin for including it as a reference book in the Books paragraph of the Related Products section of the initial Aneros WIKI.
Good Vibes to You !
@Unfug Thanks for the links, but those thread weren't quite what I was looking for. I did find some threads about this technique, here and here!
The reason why I decided to bump this thread is because I actually had some success with this technique recently. Twice I had some sort of mini-O, and in one of the sessions I had two in a row, so 3 in total. Now, these mini-O were really weak, I could barely feel them and the build up felt better than the actual orgasm. The reason why I recognize them as orgasms is because I could feel a peak followed by some sort of release. Afterwards I felt very happy and energized, and an overwhelming urge to cuddle (likely due to a release of oxytocin). The only time I remember feeling like this was from my first dry-O/mini-O several months ago, and it's nice to finally experience it again.
I'm confused. This is one of the 2 most basic masturbation techniques for me. I've been using it for years before I started playing with Aneros. For your information, I can also make myself cum by rubbing ONLY foreskin between my 2 fingers. It's not super pleasant, but it works. Incidentally this is where the myth that clitoris has 2x nerve endings comes from: most men in USA are circumcised, and the number of nerve endings they have is about halved.
@airbag Hmm, but you still ejaculate using this method? I find it pretty much impossible to ejaculate as long as I don't start doing kegels or something. I've also tried to rub the foreskin between my fingers, but I'm afraid the stimulation to the frenulum is going to cause a wet orgasm.
As for the nerve ending myth, I've tried to actually find a source for that claim, but there is none to be found. Endless articles state that fact, but none of them actually link to a study confirming it. It's seems to be a case of bad journalism causing misinformation to spread.
Yes I normally do ejaculate when I do that. But when I use Aneros I make a point not to touch my penis at all, it's always distracting for me. In fact, my most enjoyable sessions have a numbing effect on my penis, where it seemingly goes to a deep sleep and wakes up with a raging hard-on if I disturb it later. (I was initially worried that I was becoming impotent or whatever).
Thank you for this technique! Like @Unfug posted, I learned about a similar technique, but this one were much easier to execute than the one I've used. You have to focus very hard to not contract your muscles with my method, but with your method it's a piece of cake so you can really focus on the pleasureable feelings. After a short amount of time using your method, I've had many dry penile orgasm which were much more intense than normal penile orgasm. But then something crazy happened:
It almost got too intense. After a few minute I had a feeling I had to pee. This i-have-to-pee feeling got stronger and stronger until it felt like my penis was exploding any time soon. This is when I stopped all stimulation and called it a day. Very, very interesting. I never felt something like that before. Who knows, maybe I would have started squirting if I continued the stimulation?
@DarkOrb Wow! Thanks for sharing!
I definitely think you would've squirted. I've felt that urge to pee sensation as well, though not as intense as for you. I'm pretty sure I leak a tiny bit of urine when I use this technique. You should do it again in the shower, keep going when you feel the need to pee, and then report back to us! 😀
I am intrigued in this "weird penile masturbation technique." But I believe that is ideal for uncircumcised, intact guys who mostly masturbate using their foreskin and have an intact frenulum.
However I am a typical baby boomer, circumcised American whose frenulum had been excised when I was circumcised as a neonatal. I was wondering if this technique could be adapted to circumcised guys like me. I love to masturbate, though not as frequently as in earlier years because I like to save it up. I believe that I could masturbate in this fashion by holding upon the corona or rim of my Glans or not touch my frenulear delta which does trigger a full fledged ejaculatory orgasm. However the corona or rim of my Glans is rather sensitive which I enjoy!
Thom,/BigGlansDC
I don't get this technique, I can't visualise it correctly. Could someone take a pic or make a video of them doing it? Just so I can understand?
I'm confused as well but will offer what has worked for me... I hold the head of my cock with my grip and rather than doing any up and down stroking I just give short pulse squeezes to the head. Using this technique I can dance on the edge of a wet orgasm for quite a long time.