The Point of Aneros -- In My Opinion

Deleted by author

Annie, I can't either truth be told. I'll be in chat with guys, and someone new will start asking questions. I'll see Rumel and Art in the chat room and want to differ to them, but I start answering the question. I keep saying that I don't feel like one of the "old" guys doing this, but I really have been around just that long I guess. lol

I have a hard time giving advice at times because I took to this so quickly. I reposted my First Superi-O in my blog because everything I say and mention about what helps to get a Super-O is all listed in that post. I didn't realize at the time just how much of it I was getting right in just a short time span. It was my 3rd or 4th session with Eupho that I had a Super-O. It seems that I intuitively knew how to listen to my body and react and respond with the sensations instead of trying to force them. All the events of that post are simply what I felt and accepted as they were coming to me. At times it seems far fetched, but it is my experience. It was enjoyable to me. That's what matters most.

rikaaim,

I completely understand. I feel the same. I took to this quite easily. I sometimes feel guilty that it only took about four sessions to reach the places that other guys take months or years to reach. But, I have decided to just take what wonderful blessings I have and share with others so they too can experience the joy of orgasmic bliss.

I have also benefited from the tutelage of men like artform.

@AnnieRico, keep at the energy exchange. It is a joy!

Brian

@brine and @rakaaim
You guys are helping me out so much. Its really amazing:)

@MMO_RPGlol,

GREAT!!!!

Brian

@rikaaim, would you point me to the post where you describe your first super O. You've made me curious with your description and your outlook.

I've been developing a correlary to my thoughts about male sexuality to encompass gay male sexuality. I'm getting ideas for writing a story. This is very speculative.

There's been homosexuality for as long as there's been heterosexuality but because it didn't produce offspring, society's attitude towards it has changed from time to time, and from place to place. The early matriarchy, maybe as early as Neanderthals, revered and used homosexual men in their mother goddess worship. Mother goddess worship was later adopted by cro magnon humans, and kept the homosexual men as shamans who still live in remote areas even today. Mother goddess worship was concerned with fertility and used sacred prostitutes in their religious practices up to and beyond the Romans. Judaism and it's offshoots, Christianity and Islam were patriarchal religious , and were adopted by the ruling elites to control their populations with harsh authoritarian governments. During this phase homosexuality was seen as a liability since fertility was no longer a concern with the concurrent rise of cities and populations. It was variously tolerated or not according to the whim of each elite. Where Christianity ruled, there was a growing intolerance for homosexuality, even as it was practiced by many priests and ministers. With the introduction of romantic love during the middle ages homosexuality continued to be discouraged. But the concept of human choice for selecting our life partners eventually and very slowly filtered through to homosexual men. If procreation was no longer a societal concern (even if it was a church concern) and overpopulation was more the problem, then heterosexual men could tolerate these non-reproductive relationships. And homosexual men could just begin to see their loves and desires as good and a necessary part of their being. Romantic love permanently and forever separated heterosexuality from the breeding programs of the elite, and elevated love for a certain individual above all other concerns. Now romantic love is extended to include men who desire other men and women who desire other women. If two individuals can fall in love with each other without regard for the church or state, then it's a short distance for two men or two women to determine their own destiny.

Now the search is on for romantic love and a place for our queer selves. Where it will lead, nobody knows because it has never been tried like this before. We get to define our own selves, our relationships to each other, if we choose to. It's interesting to me that the first impulse of newly liberated gay men was to conform to an agreed upon "lifestyle" as if that was what all this was for. I understand the need to jump into a ready-made persona when one is left stranded without an identity, neither a man nor a woman.

Anyway that's my thinking so far. Does anyone here have any insight into this problem? Gay men here are uniquely positioned to appreciate the experience of an orgasm that's analogous to a woman's. Pleasure is a value to us in itself. So aneros would seem to be a natural place for us to hang out and experiment. What do others think?

@euphemistic, interesting questions you raise. I prefer to look at people as individuals whether gay or straight despite my christian upbringing. I really dont have enough information nor have I educated myself to the point where I would feel comfortable saying one way or the other, but romantic love i would guess is in the eyes of the beholder and not in the eyes of the viewer. I tend to be more of a libetarian in my political views and usually try to shun putting people into nice neat boxes. For example, if your gay, then your almost always democratic or liberal in your political views, why not shed these boxes and just be the individuals that we were born to be? Maybe someday in the future, huh? lol. I say whom ever someone chooses to love or be with is their own choice, lets leave the government and everyone else out of it and not make it so public, just becuase your straight or gay, noone needs to know or have it thrown in your face.

@euphemistic, there is a misconception in this line of yours:
""Gay men here are uniquely positioned to appreciate the experience of an orgasm that's analogous to a woman's.""
This suggests gay men take the female position. As far as I understand it: a gay person is attracted to the same gender, a straight person is attracted to an opposite gender. Which role they feel comfortable with is their inclination. I also think that there is not a parallel with the " bottom" person as the physiology is different.
Just my thoughts.

You're right, @Isvara. I guess I was generalizing from my own experience and projecting it onto all gay men. I could have just thought of the posts in this forum from many different men all appreciating these deep orgasms, to see where I was wrong. However, I didn't mean by that quote anything about top or bottom, passive or active, masculine or feminine though. I guess I meant the willingness to bend our gender roles to be who we are.

And@Ineverknew, I get straight men "thowing it in my face" almost every day. I don't blame them though because I know it's just part of who you all are. Why does it bother you so much when us gays act naturally as well?

I know I can sound like I'm pontificating when I get on my high hourse and start theorizing without any feedback. I was looking for some comments from other gay men about my analysis for a reality check. I appreciate comments from anyone else too as this may help my writing.

@euphemistic, I agree hetero sexuality is thrown in all of our faces. But my point was whether gay or straight it doesn't need to be so public or added to every type of TV show or advertisement. I DONT feel gay people act any differently then straight when displaying their sexuality, so I guess its the displaying on both sides that seems unnecessary. Just my opinion though. One last point, I think we can all agree that sex sells and has become mainstream for selling almost everything. For an example of advertising out of control you can search for a YouTube video of Carl's Jr and Kate Upton. That's what I'm talking about lol. Let's bring back romanticism from say the 50's, I could handle that gay or straight 😉

@euphemistic

Here is the link to my blog where I share my first Super-O experience from my Eupho. I decided to find it and preserve it in my blog because many of the ideas that I share here I explain in that blog post and the results. It was Rumel and others who first described the silent observer to me. I found the easiest way for me to achieve this state was to insert my Eupho and then take a nap. My body did the rest.

https://community.aneros.com/display-entry/?id=1606

Deleted by author