super o on wikipedia

Interestingly, if you look up "orgasm", there is a sub-category reference to the super o. Some of the info isn't exactly correct, though. But I guess that's the beauty (and downside) of wikipedia (anyone can edit an entry).

i had put a good bit of effort into editing an informative section on the page about orgasm, describing male multiple orgasm.

but it was largely reversed.

the problem is that ideally the wikipedia expects citations and other forms of independent substantiation. i had cited this site and the forum but that wasn't enough. i decided i wasn't going to fight a battle about it.

darwin

Haven't there been any scientific studies into the super o? Most every other kind of orgasm in men and women seems to have been pretty rigerously studied.

Is the super o really so new that the scientific community hasn't gotten round to it yet? Even caught wind of it?

Wow... I guess this is what it was like for Victorian women eh? Living in a society that doesn't believe your orgasm exists.

Although to be fair I don't even know i the super o exists, I'm going on good faith that this isn't one huge ruse ^^

Although to be fair I don't even know i the super o exists, I'm going on good faith that this isn't one huge ruse ^^

Hahaha, yes we have nothing better to do but to lie to you and make you believe that the super O is real. Just kidding, you've caught us. We're all actually employed by aneros to make people believe that male super O's exist and that the aneros actually really gives you super O's.
Seriously though.
The battle it seems here on this forum is that there are the aneros users that have achieved super O's ands those who haven't. The ones that have feel compelled to continue to encourage and explain to the ones that haven't that the super O really does exist I feel because since they've experience it, it almost "hurts" them in a way to see others that don't believe it exists. Then there's the ones who haven't experienced it and after many attempts with the aneros can't achieve it and feel it's all BS.
It's something that has to be felt to be believed unfortunately though by reading this forum you've just got to believe that the people here who have super O's are for real. For some it's easier and others it's harder to have success with the aneros. That's just the way it goes. The saying practice makes perfect seems pretty legit when dealing with the aneros.
I must say I fully believe what the people here post about there super O sessions because I managed to get to the super O state on my 2nd session with the aneros so see the possibilities for male orgasms. Unfortunately unlike traditional masterbation or sex, a session with the aneros can vary and sometimes not yield what you want. But it sounds from the experienced users, that after the re-wiring takes place that it becomes much easier to get to the super-O state. So keep at it cause the male super O is a reality. I put that on my moms life lol.

I'm in the scientific area of academics, scientific philosophy is a big deal to me, it's not that I disbelieve these super o stories, I am simply withholding judgement because I just don't have any proof. I apply this to all situations in life.

I'm of course going to try it anyway, but this sort of thing really needs to be scientifically studied. Detailed physiological investigation of the super o is the sort of thing that could pave the way for even more intense forms of stimulation in the future.

I tell you now, if I ever manage to attain what is described here as a super o, I'm getting in touch with scientific journals etc. immediately. I'd be prepared to undergo brain scans etc.

I mean as far as I can tell, the scientific community seem completely unaware of what are claimed here to be entirely distinct forms of male orgasms from the normal penile one. If a Super O really is a new kind of orgasm, that's big, big news.

Anonicos-

i agree with you that this is an area ripe for study by the sexuality research community.

a quick search of the literature through google scholar, with the term "male multiple orgasm" turns up only one article. it is from 1989 and titled "Male multiple orgasms: A descriptive study" (pubmed id: 2818169). The abstract suggests that the authors are aware of non-ejaculatory orgasm in men. *My library doesn't have the text available on-line).

i too have fantasized about being studied and measured by scientists....

darwin

Hehe well I haven't had those fantasies as I've not had a super o yet, but if I did I'm sure I would 😉

The scientific community is embaressingly slow when it comes to orgasms. I mean it's only in the past 70 years or so that it's been generally accepted that women indeed do have orgasms.

Take female ejaculation for example. The net is full of it, people talk about it, it seems to be an accepted part of sexuality now, but so little research has been done on what is actually going on there.

I think it's made worse for men because many guys are of the state of mind that they stimulate their cock for a bit, ejaculate, and that's it. Male sexuality done. Much less exploring seems to be being done by guys than girls.

But pleasure can be pretty easily picked up by simple brain scans. If there is someone here that can have a super o, seriously, get in touch with your local unis sexual health department, talk to someone about what you've discovered - if you can just get yourself a single brain scan in the midst of a super o, the exact areas of the brain being stimulated can be determined and mapped to different parts of the body, then compared to regular orgasm.

And I'm assuming it's thought that the super o is more than just multiple orgasms, right? Because full body convulsions and waves of pleasure don't sound like the physiology of a penile orgasm to me - plus it's presumably not triggering prolactin release in the brain, which causes the refractory period, and so the brain must not be interpreting the pleasure as a penile orgasm.

Ive gotten a reply from my local sexual health clinic on the subject and they say that they have never been presented with someone claiming to have experienced a "super o" and have never heard of an scientific documentation of a "distinct form of male orgasm arriving through prostate stimulation". But they said that it was quite possible to achieve conventional orgasm, even a dry one, through prostate stim, but we all knew that.

However they did say that there have been no negative investigations on the subject, because to their knowledge there have been no investigations on it at all.

In fact, and this blew my mind, they say that they are even unaware of any detailed fMRI comparisons between a prostate and a penis induced penile orgasm o_________O

That is insane.... prostate orgasms have be known about for centuries......