MGX SYN anyone?

This is a load of rubbish. I can't post my thread and am not even able to edit it!

It says the body is 22 thousand characters too long! What the hell is going on?

Picking up on the topic, a MGX SYN would be fantastic. I am not sure if is possible with the narrow neck as this is a critical feature of the standard MGX.
Hope the problem sorts itself out.

How bout an MGX ice ?

@isvara,thanks for that! I'll try an experiment and see if I can post my original thoughts in this response!

Although my
staple Aneros fare these days consists of the two smallest Peridise models, I
do at least once each week, have a session using one of the MGX, Eupho SYN,
Helix SYN or the Progasm Junior. Of these, the one that provides the most
direct stimulation of the prostate is the MGX.

Indeed, the
MGX is still the most widely recommended tool for those setting out on the
Aneros journey and was my initial teacher. IMHO, the greatest obstacle to the
MGX is its P-tab. Much discussion has taken place on this forum as to how to
overcome the shortcomings of the MGX P-tab, mostly suggesting the fitting of an
eye dropper bulb or baby feeder bulb over the tab or even fitting a pad of
folded toilet tissue between the perineum and the P-tab in order to reduce the
discomfort generated by this tab. In fact, I still resort to using a bulb over
the p-tab to reduce the discomfort it produces and to ensure that the tool
remains directed towards the prostate.

I would like
to suggest to the HIH Company that they introduce a SYN version of the MGX,
incorporating a P-tab modified to resemble that of the Eupho SYN or the Helix
SYN, but with a slightly less flexible arm, to ensure positive contact between
the business tip of the tool and the prostate. Having a SYN version of this
tool would allow it to be used with comfort for somewhat longer sessions and
would thus appeal to more experienced Aneros users such as myself.

How’s this
for co-incidence? I have just composed this thread in MS Word without knowing that
@techpump had posted his thread “Successful alteration of MGX P tab……”. I’m still going to post my thread anyway!
Maybe my suggested MGX SYN could incorporate a P-tab along the line suggested
by @techpump!

Anyone care
to join me in this request?
@isvara, picking up on your response, the neck of the Eupho SYN is pretty narrow though!

I want a sgx syn, to those of smaller stature of which there are many. But like last time nobody will read this or give a toss!

I love my MGX classic. Had my 1st Super Os using MGX. Still use it along with my Helix Syn and Progasm Jr. I actually like the Ptab pressure of MGX...for my body it seems to hit the spot right where I need it! Never had to employ padding. However a "Syn" version might be nice if it had a stiffer Ptab than Helix Syn. Just my 2cents.

agree on the stiffer p-tab!

@Pommie - I've said this before in prior posts, but I suspect that the P-tab design on the MGX is intentional. My point being that if you are feeling it dig into you uncomfortably, then you are not relaxing enough. It's sort of a feedback mechanism to force the user to relax the anal sphincter muscles so it won't dig in so hard.

@Pommie - I've said this before in prior posts, but I suspect that the P-tab design on the MGX is intentional. My point being that if you are feeling it dig into you uncomfortably, then you are not relaxing enough. It's sort of a feedback mechanism to force the user to relax the anal sphincter muscles so it won't dig in so hard.For me it's not so much the digging that's uncomfortable, but chafing on the skin, and the feeling that it's getting stuck. The folded toilet paper thing is a big improvement on all fronts.