If you had to make a choice between giving up aneros and super o's, or giving up traditional sex with your partner or possible future partner which would you give up? I'm not talking about them making you choose... Just purely for discussion.
I haven't had a partner yet, but I am tempted to say... the partner goes!
This is like a moral dilemma question. There is no real answer. Especially if there is no outside pressure to tip the balance.
My thoughts:
Super '0' are possible without an Aneros, especially if previously experienced. Mentally you can get above the BC muscle complex and influence the prostate. Once you know the prostate is there you can't pretend it is not. It has a mind of its own!! Ejaculation is possible without a partner. To sabotage a non ejaculatory choice there are 'nocturnal emissions'. A partner may see the huge life/health benefits of both. You may see huge life benefits by doing both - I mean life expectancy benefits. Traditional sex- ejaculatory sex - it very good for the prostate and general health. It is not possible to forget you can ejaculate.
I think I can see what you are creating a discussion about, I don't think there is a clear choice there are too many variables.
Good to have the opportunity to think about this, thanks.