Best model for wet-O?

I recently acquired the Helix and I'm working on learning how to use it. One thing I noticed immediately was that ejaculation with it inserted was actually quite uncomfortable.

I still enjoy the Helix and plan on using it but a big part of why I got an Aneros was for use during sex with my wife. In that scenario my goals are more intense orgasms and increased ejaculate volume. Given the discomfort I experienced with the Helix, can anyone recommend what they feel is the best model to increase the pleasure of wet-O's?

I'm thinking MGX or Eupho (although I am still a beginner), but I'd love to hear your thoughts!

Thanks!

Hi goodtimes and welcome

Foreplay/couples sex: We started with a Helix just for p-spot stim during foreplay and our early objectives sound similar to yours. Probably used it a dozen times over a two month period then switched to SGX in late May '09 and have stayed with the SGX for couples sex, principally because there's just a nice steady anal/rectal stim but a heavy contraction shoves it on up for prostate stim. In some positions or rapid moves during foreplay, I'd get an uncomfortable/distracting 'jab' from the Helix.

In no way does this throw rocks at Helix. I think it's the most versatile tool in the Aneros arsenal.

Wet O's and edging beyond PONR: I find that the more bulk in an Aneros tool, the more my ejaculate is blocked internally. (moderate bph w/45gm prostate) With the larger-headed tools like Progasm & Helix, I tend to retain some ejaculate until I pull out the tool then drool out the rest of the semen (not my favorite sport). That doesn't happen with SGX -- clean release to the last spurt. MGX is somewhere in between SGX and Helix on this count. And, I like MGX as a general massage therapy tool. (Helix is nicer at massaging the 'laterals' of my prostate though.)

MGX provides me with the most consistent prostate contact regardless of body position or orientation. It's a bit 'fat' along its lower body and provides more fullness in the lower canal and against my Cowpers. In contrast, Helix is more agile and sensitive to body positioning and gravity. Over the long haul, you may find it can provide a wider variety of sensations than can either SGX or MGX.

I don't use Eupho during foreplay, reserving it just for Aneros sessions aimed at solo-orgasm. hth... rook

Thanks, rook.

If you don't mind, I have a couple questions for you. I'm concerned that the SGX may be too small for me at about 5'11" and 195lbs. What is your build?

Do you find the MGX at all uncomfortable during ejaculation?

Finally, (assuming I'm not too large for the SGX) do you find that the SGX increases the amount of ejaculate even though it doesn't contact the prostate as much?

Thanks again!

Hello goodtimes, 🙂

My personal opinion is different than rook's. Although I suspect that maybe because my prostate is likely not as enlarged as his is. My personal favorite for ejaculatory orgasms is the Progasm. The large size really pushes out a huge load of ejaculate, is extremely pleasurable if you can just relax and let your anus muscles rhythmically and involuntarily contract during ejaculatory orgasm causing it to push in and out of you rather than pushing the Aneros out. Plus since my Helix and MGX have had their handle/tail removed, they tend to slip and turn sideways as my anus spasms during orgasm. With my Progasm being entirely stock and intact, the P and K-tab keep in the correct position. You'll find there is a fair amount of variance in what Aneros users here like. I'd guess it has to do with slightly differing body types and where the person is at in their Aneros journey.

Love_is

Thanks, rook.

If you don't mind, I have a couple questions for you. I'm concerned that the SGX may be too small for me at about 5'11" and 195lbs. What is your build?

Do you find the MGX at all uncomfortable during ejaculation?

Finally, (assuming I'm not too large for the SGX) do you find that the SGX increases the amount of ejaculate even though it doesn't contact the prostate as much?

Thanks again!

6ft even x 185. Down from 205lb in early 60s. Now, leaner in mid-70s.

Based on my Progasm experience I probably lack the rectal resilience of a younger man. And, being monogamous, haven't made any direct comparisons. So YMMV. (BTW note: we Heteros are frequently dumb when it comes to our inner bod. -- always value comments from gay brethren and seek them out for concise answers -- particularly when it comes to age-related questions.)

No, MGX isn't uncomfortable during ejaculation even with my moderate bph. It's somewhat distracting during agile moves during foreplay. p-massage w/MGX is my twice a month therapy -- good edging tool with a clean release out of PONR for most postures/positions. As I mentioned in the prior post, MGX isn't as agile as Helix.

Read B.F. Mayfield's note on MGX in the new AnerosMe < http://www.aneros.com/forum/f5/introducing-anerosme-14307/ >. His note generally reflects how I feel about the MGX. My feeling is that it offers the nicest 'cradling' or hugging or surrounding of my prostate of any of the Aneros tools. Out of the box it's a great fit for me!! Since it has a better 'hold' on the lower rectum and the ridged stem has less slide in the sphincter it sort of "braces" my GU tract during ejaculation from edging/mb/jo.

That said, I'd still rather get laid, do yoga poses or Tai Chi with the SGX.

Now, move slowly and don't go crazy with your credit card! 🙂

I really don't like to ejaculate with the aneros inserted. I feels like it hurts the prostate too much. Sometimes if I'm just in a mood to feel a little pain with my pleasure then I'll go ahead. But for the most part the only model I'll ejaculate with in me is the peredise.

I would certainly agree that the Progasm can be a bit much during ejaculation (but I have enjoyed it on occasion this way). For couples encounters I have used the Helix, but I can understand how some might feel that it's too aggressive for that application as well. (I would not recommend the Progasm for intercourse). The MGX and the SGX are both good alternatives for ejaculation and couples encounters. If one is looking for something that establishes an anal and prostate "presence" without dominating the experience.... the SGX is a great tool! I've noticed that it almost teases me, making me reach for more, which is delightful. This is yet another instance where less is more! Thanks to Rook for the reminder, I think I will revisit my AnerosMe review on the SGX and make mention of this.

BF Mayfield