ok,so one of the awesome things about aneros is that it unlocks the ability to have multiple orgasms.
I am wondering if anyone here knows if any specific study on this has been done. Like how many actual full non-ejaculatory orgasms an "average male" can conceivably have using an aneros or through the mental & physical techniques utilized for aneros-less non-ejaculatory orgasms.
I've tried to count how many I've had using an Aneros assisted with nipple stimulation to be roughly 16~20 in a 1 hour and 40 min period, with the most being about 30 in a 2 hr period.
I've googled and can't seem to find much info to little reliable info for a study on how many non-ejaculatory orgasms a guy can have. Just curious is all.
I may be wrong, but that kind of study is likely years away! IMHO what we experience still hasn't been widely accepted by mainstream medicine. Now, I'm not in that industry, but convincing someone to fund that kind of research is likely still too far out there!
Someone please prove me wrong!
TG
Such study wont ever be funded because it wont ever promote the sell of any drug or toy... On the contrary it would prove the many scams or industrial society leaves on. Who has the money to fund that, really?
@canacan there are entities that do sexual research but there are not many. Take for example www.kinseyinstitute.org, I wonder if this phenomenon is even on their radar. I am suddenly hit with the desire to e-mail those guys!
@canacan there are entities that do sexual research but there are not many. Take for example www.kinseyinstitute.org, I wonder if this phenomenon is even on their radar. I am suddenly hit with the desire to e-mail those guys!
Re: Kinseyinstitute - Good idea!
@Canacun, Why so cynical? There are plenty of studies dedicated to agendas without monetary gain. It just happens to be easier to get funded if there is an economic incentive.
@canacan there are entities that do sexual research but there are not many. Take for example www.kinseyinstitute.org, I wonder if this phenomenon is even on their radar. I am suddenly hit with the desire to e-mail those guys!
Sorry, anything with the name of Dr Kinsey on it goes beyond my radar. If it was only for me, this name better be forgotten.
@canacan curious.. I have very little information about that institute and Dr. Kinsey other than they do sex research. Is there something negative about them?
Re: Kinseyinstitute - Good idea! @Canacun, Why so cynical? There are plenty of studies dedicated to agendas without monetary gain. It just happens to be easier to get funded if there is an economic incentive.
Oh, you prefer lobbies or hidden political agendas maybe?
At least profit for industry is an incentive you can see through. I prefer that.
Now as of the flying unicorn of researches funded with no interest behind, let's just make sense, why would anybody do that? We are not talking free hobby of a couple of enthusiasts. Real research costs big money. And money doesn't fall from trees.
@canacan As a researcher I can say that is not the whole truth of money and research. In the bis there are two types of research- Newtonian and Edisonian. Edisonian is indeed exactly as you described. It is about application research with an eventual marketable product. Newtonian research is fundamental knowledge gathering. a great example is the tremendous amount of work going into supercolliders which seek knowledge on fundamental particles and the nature of matter.
@canacan didn't realize Kinsey was into hidden political agendas. Then again.. If I agree with their agenda (I have no idea what their agenda is) then I have no problem
@JMchemist Just ask yourself, who gives the money and why?
The atom, the space programs... None of this ever was without a reason. Some science wins wars, even economical ones or ideological ones. Even art gets financed with either profit or agendas in mind. You only finanace "useless" projects when they are unexpensive... Or when the finance scout is a master scammer.
@canacan If I agree with their agenda (I have no idea what their agenda is) then I have no problem
Neither do I. LOL
But the problem here is nearly nobody much cares about MMO and lots of big interests have indeed a lot to lose if it proves entire industries (medical and para medical, plus part of public and private social security system business) to be either useless or harmful.
Kinsey is to blame for decades of entirely penis/clitoris centered sexuality... For a narrow definition of orgasm I consider extremely wrong but became the norm... For many of what went wrong with the sexual revolution... For the gender studies... For falsification of data that drove a lot of changes in public action... Is also accused of being associated with child molestation and more... If what is told about his work on transexuality on kids is true and it was made public during his lifetime most americans would have wanted him straight to death row.
But I am no expert on the subject. The only thing I know for certain is everything I believe today about sexuality (and even gender) is usually considered wrong because it goes against Kinsey's studies.
@canacan so, you dispute the concept of fundamental knowledge gathering with no end product in mind. At least consider that Most physics research of the cosmos has zero application.
@canacan so, you dispute the concept of fundamental knowledge gathering with no end product in mind.
Not at all. I think it's even in human nature.
But people who finance it have ideas of power behind it... Even if sometimes long range.
At least consider that Most physics research of the cosmos has zero application.
Physics research either comes from military or goes to military. Its a question of time. And when time says otherwise, budgets get cut.
For centuries nations with scientifical advantage have been believed to win the game of civilization and domination.
Really, why would corrupt governments give so much money to people? There must be a reason. If there is not then the tax payers may start asking questions.
Perhaps I'm being naïve but there are lots of independent Research Projects:
I don't think we are talking about getting FDA approval, which could indeed cost millions, but some independent research funded by, let's say a wealthy member of the forum, or a group of members. Or by Aneros or a group of manufacturers of prostrate massagers. Or a sex education program of a university.
Perhaps, Kinsey is not the ideal location for MMO studies. Then again I have yet to research what research is being done in the first place.
I have researched kundalini awakening topics. I managed to find one, true academic paper on it concerning symptoms and how they compare to patients in a physc ward
Physics research is NOT only funded by the military. That statements sounds a bit like propaganda
Physics research is NOT only funded by the military. That statements sounds a bit like propaganda
Sure it's not. But it's often the reason they are made anyway. And I personnaly thank them for some of it.
Perhaps, Kinsey is not the ideal location for MMO studies. Then again I have yet to research what research is being done in the first place.
I don't know, maybe my negative bias is excessive. Perhaps they have changed since old times.
Perhaps I'm being naïve but there are lots of independent Research Projects
And the longer they stay independant the more chance they end up broke.
Perhaps I'm being naïve but there are lots of independent Research Projects:
I don't think we are talking about getting FDA approval, which could indeed cost millions, but some independent research funded by, let's say a wealthy member of the forum
Whoever is wealthy enough raise his hand. (And lose is watch LOL)
Or by Aneros or a group of manufacturers of prostrate massagers.
That's already been done and we know the result : kundalini wont be supposed to exist, massagers be considered non addictive, 100% good for your health (however abusive you may be), owning multiple devices a healthy habit... And so on.
Or a sex education program of a university.
Oh god, our "friends" the lobbies once again.
Don't you know universities don't print money ?
To me there would be a whole redifinition of sexuality research to be made. MMO is just a part of it. We have most everything female just as wrong. Gender too. And the right research seems nowhere near ready to be made. It'll eventually happen. But how far int the future?
@canacan i am new here so I don't want to come across too strong. Plus, I promise I'm not trying to be hostile with my next statement- bold statements need concrete examples. Could you give examples of what is wrong and what constitutes the right research?
@Canacun,
LOL, Well it would most certainly be an interesting study of neurology. One that may have many other implications that haven't yet been thought of as often happens during the discovery phase of research.
How far into the future - Who knows, but I agree it will happen, whether it is for profit or in the name of science or medicine!
Oh god, our "friends" the lobbies once again.
Don't you know universities don't print money ?
Indeed I do know! But often they are funded with monies that are not directed towards a goal. "In the name of RESEARCH". Research not paid for by the government, or a lobby. A lot of monies are donated in the name of education.
I feel it is rather obsessive for one to count one's orgasms. Is this really necessary, in order for one to enjoy the experience? It is also quite a high degree of gluttony involved when one spends the better part of everyday orgasming (Aneros or sans Aneros). This is another hot bed for imbalance, Energy blockages, and over use of the Aneros. Can anyone say Kundalini Syndrome?
@Pspotsquirter, Did you mean to add that comment to this thread?
@Longshanks
Indeed I did good sir. Curiosity killed the cat! But the cat had nine lives. If another goal (max # of orgasms a man can have in a 24 hour period) was set, would this not cause further issues and problems with the experience for most?
@Pspotsquirter,
Ah yes, I see the conversation had digressed from the original question so far that I had forgotten what the original question was.
And for that, I apologize to @Anon-user36
So who would personally sign up to demonstrate a SuperO for the nice, friendly researchers? Anyone?