Eupho - Classic vs Syn thoughts?

I have both versions of the Eupho. The syn is one of my favorite toys and the regular white version does nothing for me.

@PassingThru
I have had SuperO with both versions.
They provide different sensations.
Sometimes one is better than the other, and vice versa.
It all depends on what the body needs at that time.

The classic's seem to have better movement than the syn's. It may depend on the type and/or amount of lube. I prefer a smaller, less messy, amount of synthetic lube. I believe the syn's aren't to be used with synthetic lube due to break down of the outer material.

I recently purchased the Maximus classic and am loving it. So much movement plus excellent prostate contact.

I don't own the eupho model, but silicone lube is amazing and you can't use it with Syn (because it dissolves your toy!!).

@PassingThru
I have had SuperO with both versions.
They provide different sensations.
Sometimes one is better than the other, and vice versa.
It all depends on what the body needs at that time.

This is my experience as well.

And so.... now there may be three and soon four versions of Dame Eupho !

Just to stir the pot, here's a bit of Eupho history that may be the result of the Aneros evolution.

A recent post- July fourth cleanup of my house yielded some 'forgotten' personal effects including two Eupho Classic's (made from old, White Acetal plastic). Along with other small items, these bathed in Clorox for a few hours then me for a shower and a hand scrubbing with wash cloth and bar soap. Then the whole batch (save for a Eupho-syn) headed to the dishwasher. This morning I fetched the two Eupho-classics and did a close inspection, looking for any identifying initials or other marks of ownership. None found. I thought them to be "twins" until I found one was a bit rough in one inch of the body area between the abutment arm (where the tail and p-tab arm meet with what some people call the "base") and a point where the body narrows into it's "wasp waist." I took a closer look with a 10 power loupe. IMHO this 'roughening' was professionally applied and too even to be the result of a casual sand-paper job.

A call to my bro, then about 900 miles away asked if he might have left his Dame Eupho at my house. Did you leave something here at the house ? Yes.

Just for grins I wanted to give each a ride and see what the difference might be. During my early dating experience with Dame Eupho it was always Vaseline on the entire body of the toy then about 1/2 of a lube-shooter of Astroglide or Slippery Stuff (gel) along the ano-rectal canal. Now, both my bro and I apply a coating of Prep-H ointment to the lower body and shoot Coconut Oil inside. (I vary that by sliding in a couple of Shea Butter/Coconut Oil slugs which melt rapidly.

"Bottom line result. I could tell the difference, no-sweat! The Eupho with the rough (etched ?) body felt more slippery and the lube-life was better.

During a session, Dame Eupho excites more geography in my canal, along my Prostate and in 'nooks and crannies' that other toys just don't reach.

Way back in the early era, there was steady Forum Chatter that Eupho justified it's high price based on its more complex production with "unique features and attention to product detail. I think that to be true... the early Eupho models retailed for 15 to 20 dollars more than the MGX. As the years rolled by, the difference in price equalized and the 'labor-intensive' rationale went away.

Posts comparing the surface on Acetal toys with the "ICE" (ABS and Polystrene) surfaces on various Progasm's used to grow groggy on how well a 'properly prepared' Acetal surface stacks up with the native slick

So, how about it Aneros. Is the Eupho-Trident the third or the fourth in a sequence of premium massagers ??

My "bottom" line: I'm ripe for Dame Eupho-Trident. Hope my bro will take some time for this highly-subjective assessment of smooth Acetal versus "roughened" Acetal.